The expandable home trend in Tri-Valley: 1960s–1970s
In the booming post-war years of the 1960s and 1970s, the Tri-Valley area embraced a unique housing innovation: the expandable home. Designed to grow with families, these flexible homes offered affordable initial pricing with the option to add bedrooms and living spaces later. This clever concept met the needs of young buyers eager to start their homeownership journey without sacrificing future space or comfort.
What are expandable homes?
Expandable homes were built with unfinished areas—often an upper floor or basement—that could be completed as families expanded or budgets allowed. This modular approach allowed buyers to purchase a smaller, more affordable home upfront, then customize and enlarge it over time.
![]() |
A 1968 bonus room in action—finished as a lively games room, showing the flexibility of expandable home design. |
Builders highlighted models like the “Room Maker,” which debuted in the late 1960s in Dublin. With 3 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms initially, it featured an unfinished second story that could be finished later, adding a hobby space, more bedrooms, and a bathroom.
![]() |
The Room Maker model offered affordable flexibility for growing families. |
Why did expandable homes become popular?
Affordability: Rising home prices and limited financing options made expandable homes attractive to first-time buyers.
Flexibility: Families could move in quickly and expand their living space as needed.
Customization: Buyers could tailor the home’s growth according to their personal preferences and financial means.
Expandable homes in Tri-Valley communities
Dublin: a creative start
Parkwood San Ramon – Monarch Construction (1962)
One of the earliest expandable designs came from Monarch Construction in Parkwood San Ramon.
![]() |
The Plan 3 model featured an entire second floor as a “bonus room.” |
Appletree – American Housing Guild (1967)
The Room Maker model introduced an unfinished second story that included windows but unfinished, highlighting the do-it-yourself nature of these homes.
![]() |
The Room Maker: a creative solution for families looking to build as they go. |
Livermore: a pioneer in affordability
Somerset – H.C. Elliott (1968)
The original Somerset House offered a two-bedroom layout with an unfinished second story.
![]() |
Somerset House with flexible design—stairs and windows sold separately. |
A revision of the Somerset House, the 1969 Spacemaster included blueprints and a kit for a 500 sq. ft. second story. In 1970 it came with pre-installed second-story windows and a DIY staircase kit.
![]() |
The Spacemaster: offering blueprints, windows, and a staircase kit for future upgrades. |
Pleasanton: a future-forward option
Valley Trails – Morrison Homes (1970)
Morrison’s Now and Future House lived up to its name with a design that could be purchased as a finished 4-bedroom or left at a 2-bedroom starter.
![]() |
The Now and Future House gave buyers a choice: grow now or later. |
San Ramon: flexible living in a country setting
Country Club Park – Volk-McLain (1962)
The Woodside model offered an upstairs “bonus room” or up to three additional bedrooms and a bath.
![]() |
Woodside model in Country Club Park, San Ramon, with flexible second-story potential. |
California Classics – William Lyon Homes (1968)
The Look Ahead House included a convertible second story that could be finished later as two more bedrooms.
![]() |
California Classics Look Ahead House: understated, expandable elegance. |
Impact on Tri-Valley’s growth
The expandable home trend helped fuel the rapid suburban expansion of Tri-Valley in the 1960s and 1970s. By allowing families to buy within their means and build equity gradually, these homes supported a broader demographic of homeowners, contributing to the area’s diversity and vitality.
Legacy of expandable homes today
Many of the original expandable homes remain in Tri-Valley neighborhoods, their once-unfinished spaces now fully realized. These homes stand as a testament to a forward-thinking approach to suburban development—balancing affordability, practicality, and family needs.
Comments
Post a Comment